Online Harms White Paper - Government Consultation - My response

I recently joined the Open Rights Group as a member and was asked to respond to the Governments Online Harms regulation plans within their open consultation which ends the 1st of July - Online Harms White Paper - Government Consultation. 

Below is my response. Please do the same and keep the UK free from unelected regulators that could harm freeness of speech. 

While we all agree, there is a need to tackle and deal with both illegal and harmful content online this must be put into the balance with our fundamental human rights of freedom of expression. 

Users of social media, blogging sites and sites that encourage this freedom of expression need to be able to defend their right to publish legal content. 

This issue with a regulatory framework, like the one you are suggesting, is that online companies will take the easy route to compliance. This is that they will create automated, indiscriminate algorithms and technology that takes down content that 'might' fall under the online harms act. 

Whilst this might be fine for the illegal content its the content that sits in the grey box of not being illegal but may cause harm. There is too much ambiguity here, and with that, there is room for massive error and the closing down of legitimate content. 

Digital companies will take the easy route out as we see YouTube and others doing now when it comes to claims of Copyright. They do not contact the person being claimed against; they do not check the validity of the request; they just delete the content, or de-monetise or de-platform the user. 

This can become a form of censorship that could mean individual users could get de-platformed for their point of view.  

Let's just look at the term 'disinformation' who defines what this is, is there a clear definition and who decides that boundary. We could say political propaganda and the PR business around it is 'disinformation'.

We also have to ask the question where is the task force to tackle those perpetrating the 'illegal harms'. 

This legislation seems tailored to tackling the platforms and the removal of content. But where are the plans to tackle those that are clearly committing illegal acts of harm?

My fear is also for those who unwittingly promote or forward on 'disinformation' as you will see if you read the demos report "Warring Songs: Information Operations in the Digital Age" shows how a)Fact-checking alone is not enough as it only deals with a small % of the issue and b)people can unwittingly be drawn into promoting content from these Information Operations. These people could be de-platformed, silenced or censored, which is an infringement of their human rights.

A quote from the Newstatesmen summaries it well "Disinformation is particularly blurry, and will likely prove contentious for a future regulator. The DCMS spells out some expectations, including "promoting authoritative news sources", and suppressing content "disputed by reputable fact-checking services".

How far should the government go in determining what fictions are acceptable? When does a legitimate hunch become a conspiracy theory? These are political questions that require considered – and democratic – responses. While the government's move towards regulating the internet is a welcome step, there will be many who look at these proposals with justified suspicion."

The scheme pushes towards automated takedowns and speed, both of which are likely to come at the cost of accuracy. Accuracy is as important as removal for a scheme to be legitimate.

This process of using an Independent Regulator is also very questionable. They will not be elected but will have great power to decide what is free expressions it protects and what it restricts. This does not promote fair and accurate decisions. 

The UK does not, and should not, allow state regulation of the press, allowing them to freely challenge and comment on issues, why would we not allow the same freedoms to millions of citizens and their lawful online speech. 

Read more about Open Rights Group's position here:
https://www.openrightsgroup.org/about/reports/org-policy-responses-to-online-harms-white-paper

View the full DCMS consultation:
https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/online-harms-white-paper

 

There is also no explanation as to how harms and risk are being defined which is a central question of the duty of care. This could be too wide and impact legitimate online speech.

The proposal is also unrealistically vast and broad which will make them almost impossible to implement without a scatter gun approach that forces companies to take down legitimate content with no route to complain by the user. A more focused rights-based approach on social media as promoted by the Open Rights Group makes more sense. 

Before going ahead with such a scheme there needs to be more public and industry consultation in order to facilitate discussions on a better way forward. 

written by The Mentalist Poet

The Mentalist Poet published an article
This is a repost of an article written by me in 2016/17 from a site I have now closed down. 
The last three major elections/votes in the US and UK have been filled with shock. First came Brexit, then came Trump and now we have a hung parliament in…
Jun 6
The Mentalist Poet posted a video
An introduction to this new series. Which has changed focus slightly since this video was made. Initially, it was all about behavioral communication and meta-cognitive analysis to make sense of the narratives, tools, techniques, and technologies…
Jun 6
The Mentalist Poet published an article
We keep stepping forward, each breath through time,
Each step moving closer to death and rebirth,
In a continual continuum of space,
Stepping in beat,
Moving forward,
Falling off one’s own feet,
Tumbling from this event, that thing and when,
Not…
Jun 3
The Mentalist Poet posted a video
Dominic Cummings Select Committee Body Language: is Dominic Cummings lying? Is Dominic cummings telling the truth about Boris Johnson and Carrie Symonds, and Matt Hancock? Four of the world's top body language and behavior experts weigh in.…
Jun 2
The Mentalist Poet posted a video
On this GDPR Day, we’ve joined forces with partners across Europe to stop illegal online ad systems from violating our privacy rights. Watch the video now & use our tool to tell your MEPs to #StopStalkerAds 👉 https://www.stopstalkerads.org
May 28
The Mentalist Poet posted a video
Meaning
 
What is meaning?
What do we mean when we ask or look for meaning?
Of things?
Of Situations?
Of life?
What does meaning mean to us?
Why do we search for it?
Why do we search for it?
And long for it?
For ourselves?
For our loved ones?
For…
May 20
The Mentalist Poet posted a video
In his talk, Simon Lancaster will take you on a journey into the surreal, raising profound questions about the power of language and the language of power. Forget fake news and alternative facts, the biggest lie we are told every day is that there…
May 3
The Mentalist Poet posted a video
Fantastic conversation from two heavyweights of their respective fields, Behavioural Economics and History regarding the Global Trends in technology and economic structures that are Shaping Humankind's future. 
Daniel Kahneman and Yuval Noah Harari…
Apr 15
The Mentalist Poet posted a video
In a world where reality is subjective and fake truths out way facts what can you believe? You spend your days downloading digital delusion and confusion and fear is all you see. The world looked a little different yesterday, or so you think. But…
Feb 15
The Mentalist Poet updated their profile
Jan 26
The Mentalist Poet published an article
We live in a fractured world. I don’t think that is a surprise to anyone or a controversial statement. We have some hope with the changes in leadership in the US but even with a new leader over there the country is fractured, torn down the middle by…
Jan 23
The Mentalist Poet posted a video
---
A world stuck in its own shadow not growing
Not moving the way, we were told it would
Was it a lie?
A mass conspiracy
A social hoax, on us all
An experiment gone wrong
They promise so much and yet deliver so little
False prophets peddling fear…
Jan 17
The Mentalist Poet updated their profile
Jan 14
Editorial Team published an article
A personal finance budget is more than simply a family budget. A finance budget includes more sophisticated financial options such as stocks, bonds, and other investments. Simple personal budgets can be done with a spreadsheet. You can even do it on…
Jan 10
The Mentalist Poet posted a video
Step inside yourself, they say Set aside your outer senses Step inside and see Your inner workings Step inside and see What is hidden What awaits you there Fear not Although the path may be weary for your soul It is worth doing Knowing your inner…
Jan 7
Editorial Team posted a blog post
The 2020 election was marked by severe political divisions, a public health crisis, unease about the voting process, concerns about…


Some interesting data here; whilst most Americans surveyed seem to believe they had enough information to make a…
Dec 14, 2020
More…